Is there any glamour in insurance?

June 11th, 2010

All one has to do is to look at the cover of insurance industry publications to determine that this industry is very, very boring. For instance Rough Notes rarely has women, minorities or young people on its cover. Granted most insurance brokerage owners are white males over a certain age, but isn’t there any way to find people who are breaking the mold? I guess not successful people.

Insurance companies also seem to all operate the same way which is to make it difficult to purchase their products. If we ever got past the use of standardized applications such as those provided by Acord and standardized policy wordings such as those provided by ISO, this industry would be forced to be more innovative and maybe find people who have a different way of thinking about things. What do you think? Let us hear your opinion on whether or not standardization is one reason this industry has changed since the passage of the McCarran Ferguson act in 1945….

Soft Market Woes

June 11th, 2010

I am sure that most individuals associated in any way to the insurance industry are tired of hearing the groans from agents/brokers about when the soft market will end. Now don’t get me wrong I too remember how easy the hard market was, when there were plenty of submissions and one could take their time, sell based on coverage or even turn down business that was undesirable. The soft market among other things tests insurance professionals and weeds out the weakest. I like to think of the soft market as its own version of Darwin’s Survival of the Fittest.
I love the challenge of the soft market where underwriters and brokers alike are required to be innovative, competitively priced and above all offer exceptional customer service.
I think that the insurance industry has effectively handicapped itself due to the last hard market. During this glory time we pumped out insurance professionals and underwriters who for the most part had no talent and lacked even a basic knowledge of insurance.

This new generation of “professionals” are hurting the most, since on average they have never had to fight to save an account, they have never had to explain coverages, and they have never had to work through a complicated risk. They are a generation of sales people with no real sales experience. On the other side of the spectrum are the insurance professionals who joined our industry during one of the very common soft markets. These individuals learned from the beginning how to survive and adapt to an ever changing marketplace.

A more seasoned insurance agent knows the fluctuations of the industry. They are able to prepare for the soft market and hold onto their book of business surviving based on skills and prowess until the rare hard market makes its way back and lasts for a couple of years at best.

It also seems that this new generation has more whiners than in past. Having gone through numerous hard/soft markets I can say that the noise level of complaining during this one is much worse than ever before. I say chalk this up to inexperience.

Diversity in Insurance

July 17th, 2009

Diversity in Insurance

On May 4, in the National Underwriter press online, the President of the CPCU said insurers need a wider diversity effort and should have community outreach programs.  The wider diversity idea is certainly true – the insurance industry does not have any variety of people.  However community outreach programs alone aren’t going to cut it.   Why on earth would any young person want to come into insurance?   We copy each other’s policy forms and applications, and carriers chase down the same business and cut each other’s prices.   There are very few women roll models and essentially no minorities in any real positions.

Even if we had college programs, the mind set of our industry is so non-innovative that there is no reason anyone would consider this an interesting, exciting career.   Fundamental changes need to happen – just look at our industry publications to see that everyone looks alike.   A recent article on diversity in a print magazine showed pictures of white men over 40 with their ideas as to why our industry was not attracting young people.   Duh.

Aren’t there companies or brokers or individuals out there who can make our industry more interesting and cutting edge?

Regulatory Reform on the Federal Level

May 6th, 2009

Why do brokers and their organizations continue to support state licensing? The logic of this continues to elude me. A May 4 article in the P & C National Underwriter has the President of the IIABA urging brokers to weigh in on the matter of Federal Regulation. I can only assume he means that this is for continuing state licensing. How can that possibly be? My agency has retail and surplus lines licenses in virtually every state which means 150-200 licenses. In some of those states, we have to file our corporation. Why do people in our own industry support a system that is detrimental to our operations?

The president of the IIABA then goes onto talk about recruiting young people. Maybe if we had a more up to date, internet friendly industry such as national licensing, we might be able to attract young people who appreciate savvy business procedures. Our industry system was set up in 1945 with the passage of the McCarran Ferguson act and our modes of operation have not changed a lot since then.

Isn’t it time we updated the way we do business?